Effectiveness of methotrexate and leflunomide as corticoid-sparing drugs in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

Objectives: The need for glucocorticoid-sparing drugs (GCSD) remains an important issue and is an unmet need in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). We therefore aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of methotrexate (MTX) and of leflunomide (LEF) in daily clinical practice in PMR patients from Argentina. Methods: A multicentre and observational study (medical records review) of PMR patients seen between 2007 and 2023, who had at least three months of follow-up after starting a GCSD, either MTX or LEF, was performed. Results are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges [25th-75th (IQR)] for continuous variables and percentages for categorical ones. The two treatment groups were compared using χ2 test for categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the log-rank test for time-to-event data. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression. In all cases, a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One-hundred and eighty-six patients (79% female) with a median age of 72 years (IQR, 65-77 years) were included. One-hundred and forty-three patients (77%) were prescribed MTX (15, IQR 10-15) and 43 (23%) LEF (20 mg, fixed dose). Flare-ups (relapses and recurrences) occurred in 13 patients (7%) and were comparable between both groups. Persistent GCSD intake was observed in 145 patients (78%). Glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal was achieved in 67 of these 145 patients (46%) and this occurred more frequently in the LEF group (P = 0.001). Furthermore, time until prednisone discontinuation was shorter in the LEF-treated patients (4.7 months, IQR 3-20 on LEF versus 31.8 months, IQR 10-82 on MTX, P = 0.000). Remission was found more frequently in the LEF group (P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, the probability of remission was higher with LEF therapy (P = 0.010) and this finding persisted in the subgroup analysis who were followed up < 40 months (OR 3.12, 95% CI = 1.30-7.47, P = 0.011). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of LEF and even its superiority in achieving remission when compared with MTX as GCSD in PMR patients. Further research is needed to support these findings.

Speciality training in rheumatology: Promotion, repetition and dropout rates in the city of Buenos Aires.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the trajectory of students enrolled in the specialty training in rheumatology. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (2009-2016). Promotion, repetition, and dropout rates were determined. Analysis was performed to define variables associated with academic success. RESULTS: Out of 119 students, the actual promotion rate was 66.4%, 11.8% failed an exam (at least) and completed the course after the stipulated time, and the dropout rate was 7.6%. Among residents, the promotion rate was 82.5% vs. 48.2% among the rest (p < 0.001), the lagging students' repetition rate was 3.2% vs. 21.4% among the rest (p 0.005), and the dropout rate was 3.2% vs. 12.5% among the rest (p = 0.06). A higher average score in medical school increased the chances of success in the postgraduate programme (OR 3.41 CI 95% 2.0-6.4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The residency was associated with higher rates of academic success in postgraduate studies. The average score in medical school can help identify students at risk of failure.

Risk Factors for Relapse and/or Prolonged Glucocorticoid Therapy in Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Multicenter Study in 185 Patients.

BACKGROUND: In polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) relapses and long-term GC dependency are common. We assessed risk factors for higher relapse rate and/or prolonged glucocorticoid therapy in PMR patients. METHODS: A multicenter and observational study (chart review) of PMR patients seen between 2006 and 2021 who had at least a 3-month follow-up period after starting GCs was performed. Results were expressed as median and interquartile range 25th-75th or mean ± standard deviation for numerical variables and percentage for categorical ones. Relapse versus nonrelapse groups were compared using Cox proportional analysis. Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. In all cases, a p value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: We included 185 patients (69.1% female). The median follow-up time was 17.1 months (interquartile range, 6.8-34.7). Incidence of relapses was 1.2 per 100 persons/month. In univariate analysis, PMR patients with a previous history of dyslipidemia had a lower risk of relapse (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94; p = 0.03); high-dose GC (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.42-3.87; p = 0.001) and faster GC dose reduction had higher risk of relapse (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.77-5.21; p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a previous history of dyslipidemia had a lower risk of relapse (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92; p = 0.023), and high dose of GC (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.49-4.08; p = 0.001) remained the only risk factors for relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Lower doses of corticosteroids and a slow rate of reduction are critical to avoid relapse in PMR. Risk factors for higher relapse rate rely on therapy more than clinical characteristics of the patients at the time of diagnosis of PMR.

Time to Publication and Time-Lag Publication Bias for Randomized Trials on Connective Tissue Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the time from completion to publication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on connective tissue diseases (CTDs), investigate the factors associated with, and explore the influence of significance of study results on time to publication (time-lag publication bias). METHODS: We included interventional, phase 2/3, 3, or 4 RCTs on CTDs registered in Clinicaltrials.gov from 2000 to 2016, whose results had been published in a peer-review journal less than 5 years after their completion. Main trial features, including the significance of primary outcome results, were collected. Time to publication was the time from study completion to the earliest publication date. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with time to publication. RESULTS: We included 62 studies, mostly phase 3 (61%) trials on pharmacologic treatments (94%); we recruited patients with systemic lupus (55%) or systemic sclerosis (23%) and planned to enroll a median of 131 (IQR [interquartile range]: 61-288) patients. Twenty-two (35%) reported at least a statistically significant primary outcome. Median time to publication was 28 months (IQR: 17-36). In a multivariable analysis, time to publication progressively improved over time (faster publication in recent years, with the average time to publication decreasing by 1.3 [95% CI: 0.3-2.3] months per year) and was not influenced by the significance of primary outcome results, funder, impact factor of the journal, number of recruiting countries, and comparator. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of CTDs-RCTs is published beyond 2 years from completion. We did not find evidence of time-lag publication bias, and time to publication improved over time.

Seguridad de las drogas biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas utilizadas en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Datos del registro BIOBADASAR 3.0 / Safety of biological and targeted synthetic drugs in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Data from the BIOBADASAR 3.0 registry

Introducción: conocer la seguridad de las drogas actualmente disponibles para el tratamiento de las enfermedades reumáticas es muy importante al momento de tomar decisiones terapéuticas objetivas e individualizadas en la consulta médica diaria. Asimismo, datos de la vida real amplían el conocimiento revelado por los ensayos clínicos. Objetivos: describir los eventos adversos (EA) reportados, estimar su frecuencia e identificar los factores relacionados con su desarrollo. Materiales y métodos: se utilizaron datos BIOBADASAR, un registro voluntario y prospectivo de seguimiento de EA de tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas inmunomediadas. Los pacientes son seguidos hasta la muerte, pérdida de seguimiento o retiro del consentimiento informado. Para este análisis se extrajeron datos recopilados hasta el 31 de enero de 2023. Resultados: se incluyó un total de 6253 pacientes, los cuales aportaron 9533 ciclos de tratamiento, incluyendo 3647 (38,3%) ciclos sin drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas (DME-b/sd) y 5886 (61,7%) con DME-b/sd. Dentro de estos últimos, los más utilizados fueron los inhibidores de TNF y abatacept. Se reportaron 5890 EA en un total de 2701 tratamientos (844 y 1857 sin y con DME-b/sd, respectivamente), con una incidencia de 53,9 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año (IC 95% 51,9-55,9). La misma fue mayor en los ciclos con DME-b/sd (71,1 eventos cada 1000 pacientes/año, IC 95% 70,7-77,5 versus 33,7, IC 95% 31,5-36,1; p<0,001). Las infecciones, particularmente las de la vía aérea superior, fueron los EA más frecuentes en ambos grupos. El 10,9% fue serio y el 1,1% provocó la muerte del paciente. El 18,7% de los ciclos con DME-b/sd fue discontinuado a causa de un EA significativamente mayor a lo reportado en el otro grupo (11,5%; p<0,001). En el análisis ajustado, las DME-b/sd se asociaron a mayor riesgo de presentar al menos un EA (HR 1,82, IC 95% 1,64-1,96). De igual manera, la mayor edad, el mayor tiempo de evolución, el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, el diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y el uso de corticoides se asociaron a mayor riesgo de EA. Conclusiones: la incidencia de EA fue significativamente superior durante los ciclos de tratamientos que incluían DME-b/sd.

Introduction: knowing the efficacy and safety of the drugs currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases is very important when making objective and individualized therapeutic decisions in daily medical consultation. Likewise, real-life data extends the knowledge revealed by clinical trials. Objectives: to describe the reported adverse events (AEs), estimate their frequency and identify factors associated to them. Materials and methods: BIOBADASAR data were used, which is a voluntary, prospective follow-up registry of AEs of biological and synthetic treatments in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Patients are followed until death, loss of followup, or withdrawal of informed consent. To carry out this analysis, the data collected up to January 31, 2023 was extracted. Results: a total of 6253 patients were included, who contributed with 9533 treatment periods, including 3647 (38.3%) periods without b/ts-DMARDs and 5886 (61.7%) with b/ts-DMARDs. Among the latter, the most used were TNF inhibitors and abatacept. A total of 5890 AEs were reported in a total of 2701 treatments (844 and 1857 without and with b/ts-DMARDs, respectively), with an incidence of 53.9 events per 1000 patients/ year (95% CI 51.9-55.9). It was higher during the periods with b/ts-DMARDs (71.1 events per 1000 patients/year, 95% CI 70.7-77.5 vs 33.7, 95% CI 31.5-36.1, p<0.001). Infections, particularly those of the upper respiratory tract, were the most frequent AEs in both groups. 10.9% were severe and 1.1% were associated with the death of the patient. 18.7% of the periods with b/ts-DMARDs were discontinued due to an AE, significantly higher than that reported in the other group (11.5%; p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis, b/ts-DMARDs were associated with a higher risk of presenting at least one AE (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.64-1.96). Similarly, older age, longer evolution time, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and use of corticosteroids were associated with a higher risk of AE. Conclusions: the incidence of AEs was significantly higher during those treatment periods that included DME-b/sd.

Calidad de vida en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica en confinamiento por pandemia de COVID-19 en Argentina / Quality of life in patients with systemic sclerosis in confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina

Introducción: los pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas tienen una calidad de vida significativamente deteriorada. La pandemia por COVID-19 tuvo un notable impacto sobre la población y los sistemas de salud de todo el mundo. Objetivos: en este trabajo nos proponemos conocer el impacto de la pandemia en la calidad de vida de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica (ES) y cómo fue el acceso a la atención médica. Materiales y métodos: mediante encuestas anónimas y digitales a pacientes durante julio y agosto de 2020 se evaluó la calidad de vida utilizando el cuestionario de calidad de vida de la esclerosis sistémica (SScQoL). Además, se realizaron preguntas para evaluar el acceso al sistema de salud durante ese período. Resultados: se encuestaron 300 pacientes con ES. La mediana de afectación de la calidad de vida según el cuestionario utilizado fue de 17 (9,25-22) y el dolor fue el dominio más afectado. El 29,33% no hizo los controles médicos. El 74,33% refirió haber tenido estudios médicos pendientes al inicio de la cuarentena y solo el 25% pudo realizarlos. Conclusiones: los pacientes con ES presentaron compromiso de la calidad de vida durante la pandemia y mostraron dificultades en el acceso al sistema de salud.

Introduction: patients with rheumatic diseases have a significantly impaired quality of life. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the population and health systems around the world. Objectives: to analyze the impact of the pandemic on the quality of life and access to medical care of patients with systemic sclerosis (SS). Materials and methods: through anonymous and digital surveys of patients during July and August 2020, quality of life was assessed using the Systemic Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (SScQoL). In addition, questions were asked to assess access to the health system during that period. Results: 300 patients with SS were surveyed. The median quality of life affectation according to the questionnaire used was 17 (9.25-22), with pain being the most affected domain. Twenty-nine percent did not attend their medical appointments, 74.33% reported having pending medical studies at the beginning of the quarantine, and only 25% could carry them out. Conclusions: patients with SS presented compromised quality of life during the pandemic and showed difficulties in accessing the health system.

Extent of and Reasons for Discontinuation and Nonpublication of Interventional Trials on Connective Tissue Diseases: An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion, the reasons, and the factors associated with the discontinuation or nonpublication of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on connective tissue diseases (CTDs). METHODS: We searched all interventional RCTs on CTDs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov since 2000. Two reviewers selected studies according to prespecified eligibility criteria. Completion status, publication status, and reported reasons for discontinuation or nonpublication were retrieved on ClinicalTrials.gov, through literature search, and by contacting investigators. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with study noncompletion and nonpublication. RESULTS: We included 175 studies, mostly phase III, placebo-controlled trials on pharmacologic treatments recruiting patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (51%), systemic sclerosis (20%), Sjögren's syndrome (12%), or other CTDs. Fifty-eight (33%) had been discontinued, mainly for insufficient patient accrual, with no differences in discontinuation rates across the CTDs (P > 0.5). Forty-six (35%) of 130 studies having included at least 1 patient were unpublished, and 86 (65%) were published in a peer-reviewed journal after a median of 24 months (interquartile range 15-41) from completion, with a significantly higher publication rate in completed versus discontinued studies (81% versus 22%; P < 0.001). We were able to obtain reasons for nonpublication in one-third of cases. Small sample size (<100 participants) was the only factor associated with study noncompletion and nonpublication. CONCLUSION: One of 3 registered RCTs on CTDs fails to be completed or published. This represents a waste of resources and raises ethical concerns regarding hidden clinical data and unfruitful participation by patients.

Factor reumatoide en vasculitis ANCA asociadas / Rheumatoid factor in ANCA associated vasculitis

Introducción: las pruebas de factor reumatoide (FR) se utilizan principalmente para el diagnóstico de artritis reumatoidea (AR), sin embargo, también pueden estar presentes en otras enfermedades. Su significado clínico en contexto de vasculitis ANCA asociadas (VAA) todavía es incierto. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer el significado clínico y pronóstico del FR en pacientes con VAA. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional, retrospectivo. Se evaluaron pacientes con diagnóstico de VAA (granulomatosis con poliangitis -GPA-, poliangitis microscópica -PAM- y granulomatosis eosinofílica con poliangitis -GEPA-), mayores de 18 años, con FR solicitado antes del inicio del tratamiento. Se recolectaron los siguientes datos: edad, sexo, tipo de VAA, duración de la enfermedad, tratamiento, órganos afectados, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), Five Factor Score (FFS), eritrosedimentación, proteína C reactiva, requerimiento de diálisis, asistencia respiratoria mecánica, mortalidad y causa de muerte. Se calculó el odds ratio (OR) y su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC 95%) para determinar la fuerza de asociación entre las variables. Resultados: incluimos 32 pacientes en los que encontramos 31,2% de FR positivo. Comparados con aquellos con FR negativo, no hubo diferencias significativas con respecto a manifestaciones clínicas, ni actividad de la enfermedad medida por el BVAS y reactantes de fase aguda. La presencia de factor reumatoide se asoció a menor ingreso a diálisis (OR 0.14 IC 0,02-0,8; p=0,02) y mortalidad (p=0,04). No hubo diferencias significativas con respecto al FFS. Conclusiones: en nuestro estudio la presencia de FR en pacientes con vasculitis ANCA se asoció a menor requerimiento de diálisis y menor mortalidad. Estos hallazgos no se correlacionaron estadísticamente con el FFS. No se encontró asociación entre la presencia de FR y el compromiso de órgano, actividad de la enfermedad, ni requerimiento de asistencia respiratoria mecánica.

Introduction: rheumatoid factor tests are mainly used for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, it may also be present in other diseases. Its clinical significance in the context of ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) is still uncertain. The objective was to establish the clinical and prognostic significance of RF in patients with AAV. Materials and methods: a retrospective observational study was carried out. Patients with a diagnosis of AAV (GPA, MAP and AGEP) over 18 years of age with RF requested before the start of treatment were evaluated. The following data were collected: age, sex, type of AAV, disease duration, treatment, affected organs, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), Five Factor Score (FFS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, dialysis requirement, attendance mechanical ventilation, mortality and cause of death. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated to determine the strength of association between variables. Results: we included 32 patients in whom we found 31.2% positive RF. Compared to those with negative RF, there were no significant differences with respect to clinical manifestations, nor disease activity measured by BVAS and acute phase reactants. The presence of the rheumatoid factor was associated with lower admission to dialysis (OR 0.14 CI 0.02-0.8 p=0.02) and mortality (p=0.04). There were no significant differences with respect to FFS. Conclusions: in our study, the presence of RF in patients with ANCA vasculitis was associated with a lower requirement for dialysis and lower mortality. These findings were not statistically correlated with the FFS. No association was found between the presence of RF and organ involvement, disease activity, or mechanical ventilation requirement.

Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología en el manejo de la arteritis de células gigantes / Recommendations of the Argentine Society of Rheumatology in the management of giant cell arteritis

La arteritis de células gigantes (ACG) es una vasculitis sistémica que afecta a personas adultas; compromete vasos arteriales de mediano y gran calibre, con potenciales complicaciones de gravedad, como la ceguera, y es considerada una emergencia médica. El objetivo de estas guías fue desarrollar las primeras recomendaciones argentinas para su tratamiento, basadas en la revisión de la literatura mediante metodología GRADE. Un panel de expertos en vasculitis elaboró las preguntas en formato PICO (población, intervención, comparador y outcomes), y luego un panel de expertos en metodología efectuó la revisión de la bibliografía con la extracción de la evidencia para cada una de las preguntas. Se realizó un focus group de pacientes para conocer sus preferencias y experiencias. Finalmente, con la información recabada, el panel de expertos en vasculitis procedió a la votación de las recomendaciones que a continuación se presentan.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis affecting adult patients and involving large and medium vessels. Potential serious complications as blindness may occur and it is considered a medical emergency. The objective of elaborating this guideline was to develop first Argentinian GCA treatment recommendations using GRADE methodology. An expert panel generated clinically meaningful questions addressing aspects of the treatment of GCA in the Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome (PICO) format and then a group of methodology experts reviewed and extracted data from literature summarizing available evidence. A patient's focus group discussion took place gathering information on their preferences and experiences. Finally, the vasculitis expert panel, with all the information obtained, voted recommendations here presented.

Guías Argentinas de Vasculitis Suplemento. Tablas arteritis de células gigantes / Argentine Vasculitis Guidelines Supplement. Giant cell arteritis tables

La arteritis de células gigantes (ACG) es una vasculitis sistémica que afecta a personas adultas; compromete vasos arteriales de mediano y gran calibre, con potenciales complicaciones de gravedad, como la ceguera, y es considerada una emergencia médica. El objetivo de estas guías fue desarrollar las primeras recomendaciones argentinas para su tratamiento, basadas en la revisión de la literatura mediante metodología GRADE. Un panel de expertos en vasculitis elaboró las preguntas en formato PICO (población, intervención, comparador y outcomes), y luego un panel de expertos en metodología efectuó la revisión de la bibliografía con la extracción de la evidencia para cada una de las preguntas. Se realizó un focus group de pacientes para conocer sus preferencias y experiencias. Finalmente, con la información recabada, el panel de expertos en vasculitis procedió a la votación de las recomendaciones que a continuación se presentan.

Frecuencia de infección por SARS-CoV-2 en asistentes a un congreso médico en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Datos del Congreso Argentino de Reumatología 2021 / Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection in attendees at a medical congress in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Data from the Argentine Congress of Rheumatology 2021

Introducción: en el contexto de la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2, la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología (SAR) organizó su congreso "híbrido" (presencial y virtual), en diciembre de 2021, en concordancia con la condición epidemiológica. El objetivo principal de este trabajo fue describir la frecuencia de nuevos casos de infección luego de asistir al Congreso y la opinión de los médicos sobre los aspectos de bioseguridad del evento, y como objetivo secundario, analizar las características de los asistentes durante la pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos: estudio transversal a través de una encuesta online, autoadministrada y anónima. Se encuestaron a los concurrentes (médicos y no médicos) al Congreso (presencial o virtual). La primera encuesta fue al momento de la inscripción y la segunda luego de 14 días de culminado, solo para los médicos. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los resultados. Resultados: 1.322 individuos se inscribieron al Congreso; 1.039 (98,9%) eran médicos. 1.051 (79,5%) completaron la primera encuesta y 501 (48,2%) contestaron la segunda. Mientras 428 (85,4%) asistieron presencialmente, la virtualidad la eligieron aquellos con más años de ejercicio (p=0,023), con comorbilidades (p=0,03) y quienes tuvieron una internación previa por SARS-CoV-2 (p=0,05). Del total, 1.028 (97,8%) estaban vacunados. El 84,6% tuvo una opinión favorable sobre la modalidad "híbrida". Cinco (1,2%) presentaron síntomas de infección por SARS-CoV-2 y tres (0,7%) tuvieron confirmación diagnóstica. Conclusiones: cinco personas registraron la infección sintomática después del evento. Las medidas de bioseguridad tomadas fueron las aconsejadas por el Ministerio de Salud de la Nación y la opinión de los médicos sobre las mismas fueron favorables.

Introduction: in the context of the pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2, the Argentine Society of Rhematology organized its "hybrid" congress (face-to-face and virtual), on December 2021, in accordance with the epidemiological condition. The main objective of this work was to describe the frequency of new cases of infection after attending the Congress and the opinion of doctors on the biosafety aspects of the event, and as a secondary objective, to analyze the characteristics of those attending the Congress during the pandemic. by SARS-CoV-2. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study, through an online, self-administered and anonymous survey. The attendees (physician and non- physician) to the congress (face-to-face or virtual) were surveyed. The first survey was at the time of registration and the second after 14 days of finish, only for physicians. A descriptive analysis of the results was performed. Results: 1,322 subjects registered for Congress; 1,039 (98.9%) were physicians. 1,051 (79.5%) completed the first survey and 501 (48.2%) answered the second. While 428 (85.4%) attended in person, virtuality was chosen by those with more years of practice (p=0.023), with comorbidities (p=0.03) and those who had a previous hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 (p =0.05). Of the total, 1,028 (97.8%) were vaccinated. 84.6% had a favorable opinion about the "hybrid" modality. Five (1.2%) presented symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and three (0.7%) had diagnostic confirmation. Conclusions: five subjects had symptoms and three confirmed infections. The biosafety measures taken were those recommended by the Ministry of Health and the opinion of the colleagues about them was favorable.

Randomized clinical trials in ANCA-associated vasculitis: a systematic analysis of the WHO - International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of the main features of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) can inform future study design. METHODS: We searched within the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform all registered RCTs on AAV from October 2008 to December 2018. Two reviewers selected studies according to pre-specified eligibility criteria. We retrieved information including countries, funding, design, sample sizes, eligibility criteria, primary outcomes (POs), and treatments. RESULTS: Among the 40 RCTs identified, 22 (55%) were conducted in Europe, 29 (72,5%) in a single country, 14 (35%) were industry-funded. The median number of patients planned to enrol was 68 (IQR 36-138). Only 28% of RCTs targeted a single vasculitis, and ANCA negative patients were not included in about 40% of studies. Interventions investigated were mainly drugs given to induce (40%) or maintain (32.5%) remission. Eighty-five percent of POs were considered being 'patient-important', but discrepancies in definition of disease states, such as remission or relapse were observed. Glucocorticoids use was part of the PO in < 25% of studies. The number of trials targeting a single disease, non-industry funded, incorporating glucocorticoids in PO, as well as the planned sample size increased over time. CONCLUSION: Despite the important achievements in the field, a better harmonization of eligibility, and outcome criteria across studies is an important objective to pursue in next future.

Changing rate of serious infections in biologic-exposed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Data from South American registries BIOBADABRASIL and BIOBADASAR.

OBJECTIVE: Most reports on serious infections (SI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are from the USA and Western Europe. Data from other regions are largely missing. We report data from South American countries with different backgrounds and health-care systems but similar registries. METHODS: We merged 2010-2016 data from two registries, BIOBADABRASIL (Brazil) and BIOBADASAR (Argentina), which share the same protocol, online platform and data monitoring process. Patients with active RA were included when they began the first bDMARD or a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD, control group). The SI incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient/years and adjusted IR ratio (aIRR) were estimated for bDMARDs and csDMARDs. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 3717 RA patients with an exposure of 13,380 patient/years. The 2591 patients treated with bDMARDs (64% tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi)) had a follow-up of 9300 years, and the 1126 treated with csDMARDs had an exposure of 4081 patient/years. The SI IR was 30.54 (CI 27.18-34.30) for all bDMARDs and 5.15 (CI 3.36-7.89) for csDMARDs. The aIRR between the two groups was 2.03 ([1.05, 3.9] p = 0.034) for the first 6 months of treatment but subsequently increased to 8.26 ([4.32, 15.76] p < 0.001). The SI IR for bDMARDs decreased over time in both registries, dropping from 36.59 (28.41-47.12) in 2012 to 7.27 (4.79-11.05) in 2016. CONCLUSION: While SI remains a major concern in South American patients with RA treated with bDMARDs, a favourable trend toward a reduction was observed in the last years.Key Points• New comprehensive data on biologic drugs safety from international collaboration in South America.• First proposal for national registries data merging in South America.• Serious infections remain a major concern in RA patients treated with biologics.• A significant reduction of serious infections in RA patients exposed to biologics was observed over a 7 years period.

Lupus eritematoso sistémico y parvovirus. ¿Relación causal?: Reporte de un caso / Systemic lupus erythematosus and parvovirus. Causal relationship?: Case report

El lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) es una enfermedad autoinmune de etiología aún desconocida, afecta a individuos genéticamente predispuestos. Es desencadenado por factores hormonales, estrogénicos, ambientales y virales como hepatitis B/C, citomegalovirus (CMV), herpes o parvovirus B19 (PVB19). El PVB19 puede afectar diferentes órganos y presentar manifestaciones clínicas e inmunológicas, similares a las que se observan en pacientes con LES. Se han descripto alteraciones inmunológicas hasta en 79% de los pacientes con infección asociada por PVB19, principalmente positivización de anticuerpos antinucleares (ANA).

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that affects genetically predisposed individuals. It is triggered by hormonal, estrogenic, environmental and viral factors such as hepatitis B/C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes or parvovirus B19 (PVB19). PVB19 can affect different organs and present clinical and immunological diseases, as well as those observed in patients with SLE. Immunological alterations have been described in up to 79% of patients with infection associated with PVB19, mainly positivization of antinuclear antibodies (ANA).

Glomerulonefritis ANCA asociada con biopsia renal atípica en paciente con artritis psoriásica: Reporte de caso y revisión / ANCA associated vasculitis with atypical kidney biopsy in context of psoriasic arthritis: Case report and review

Introducción: La glomerulonefritis rápidamente progresiva (GNRP) no se presenta como manifestación extraarticular de la Artritis Psoriasica (APs). Las GNRP son frecuentemente relacionadas a vasculitis ANCA asociadas (VAA). Según la bibliografía, no es inusual encontrar depósitos de inmunocomplejos (IC) en las lesiones glomerulares de VAA. Existen publicaciones de casos en donde la presencia de una VAA podría estar asociada a la terapia con anti-TNFα. Caso: Mujer de 56 años de edad con artritis psoriásica en tratamiento con metotrexato y etanercept. Debido a infección de vías aéreas suspende etanercept y, posterior a la suspensión, evoluciona con síndrome nefrítico con biopsia renal que evidencia GN con depósitos de IC poco característicos y ANCA c / PR3 (+) en altos títulos. Conclusiones: Presentamos una paciente en la cual la manifestación de dos entidades, aparentemente no relacionadas, representa un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico. La relación con el tratamiento anti-TNFα ha sido descripta aunque no pueda demostrarse su relación causal. La mayoría de las biopsias renales de las VAA no presentan depósitos inmunes en la IF; aunque en un porcentaje bajo pueden visualizarse grados variables de complemento e inmunocomplejos.

Introduction: Anti-TNFα has changed the evolution and prognosis in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Among the adverse events (AD) of these treatments, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (GNRP) has been described. In 80% of cases of GNRP, vasculitis is associated to ANCA (AAV). According to the literature, it is not unusual to find immune complex deposits (IC) in glomerular AAV lesions. There are publications of cases in which the presence of an AAV could be associated with the anti-TNFα therapy. Case: A 56-year-old woman with psoriatic arthritis under treatment with methotrexate and etanercept. Due to airway infection, etanercept is suspended and after the suspension evolves with nephritic syndrome with renal biopsy, which shows GN with uncharacteristic IC deposits and ANCA c / PR3 (+) in high titers. Conclusions: We present a patient in whom the manifestation of two entities, apparently unrelated, represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The relationship with the anti-TNFα treatment has been described, although its causal relationship can not be demonstrated. Most renal biopsies of AAV do not have immune deposits in the IF; although in a low percentage variable degrees of complement and immune complex deposits can be visualized.

Immune diffuse alveolar hemorrhage: Clinical presentation and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) is a manifestation of several immune and nonimmune diseases. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with immune-mediated DAH requiring hospital admission. METHODS: A retrospective study from December 2010 to December 2015, was conducted by analyzing the clinical records of 39 patients with DAH with a proven immunological origin. The diagnosis of individual collagen vascular diseases (CVD) was made according to the criteria of the corresponding societies. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included (median age 44.8 years, range 16-76). The main causes of DAH were ANCA-related vasculitis (74.3%) mainly granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n = 14) and microscopic polyangiitis (n = 13). Thirty patients (76.9%) had hemoptysis. An alveolar airspace filling pattern was found in most of patients (59%). All the patients had a drop in hemoglobin level that ranged from 1.0 to 3.0 g/dL. BAL fluid was macroscopically bloody in 43.6% of patients (n = 17) and showed siderophagic alveolitis on BAL cytology in 100%. All patients received high doses of corticosteroids. Other additional treatments were antibiotics (53,8%, n = 21), intravenous cyclophosphamide (87.2%, n = 34), plasma exchange (35.9%, n = 14); intravenous immunoglobulin (12.8%, n = 5) and rituximab in 5 patients (12.8%). Mortality rate was higher amongst patients who required dialysis (50.0 vs 15.4%, p = 0.045), with SaO2 <90% at admission (50.0 vs 5.3%, p = 0.003) or those who required mechanical ventilation (76.9 vs 6.8%, p = < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DAH may present without hemoptysis and requires an early bronchoscopy to confirm the diagnosis and exclude infection. Other characteristics could be included in the abstract which are relevant to the paper. (relation between mortality, dialysis, ventilation, etc.).